Traditional waste management vs. TroCymru
| Aspect | Traditional | TroCymru |
|---|---|---|
| Waste handling | Mixed skips — high cost, contamination | Source segregation — controlled, lower cost |
| Documentation | Paper waste transfer notes | Digital QR + GPS audit trail |
| Carbon data | Estimated, unverifiable | Verified, site-level, EN 15978 compliant |
| Visibility | Limited — once the skip leaves, you lose sight | Full chain-of-custody tracking, real-time |
| Liability | Risk remains with the client | Compliance protection built in |
Reduce Waste Costs
Up to 40% fewer skips per programme
Auditable Carbon Data
WLCA-aligned, EN 15978 compliant
Social Value
Materials routed to social enterprises
Compliance Evidence
Chain-of-custody, fly-tipping prevention
See how much value your programme could be losing without TroCymru
Adjust the sliders to see estimated waste savings, carbon impact, and social value. These are the outcomes you're leaving on the table with a traditional skip-based approach.
Your programme
Based on 50 properties × 2 skips × 40% diversion rate
WRAP/ICE-calculated, WLCA-aligned. Auditable and compliant with EN 15978 / EN 15804.
Aligned to TOMs framework and local social value delivery. Materials routed to Antur Waunfawr, GISDA, and Tŷ Gwyrddfai for community reuse.
Value retained in the North Wales economy through local partners and social enterprises.
Includes: Direct skip cost savings + Social value (£)
Plus: Compliance-ready carbon data (auditable, not estimated)
Does not include additional avoided costs such as fly-tipping enforcement, legal liability, or reputational risk.
These estimates exclude hidden costs you're already carrying
Potential savings from avoided fly-tipping enforcement (up to £50,000 per incident), legal costs, site remediation, and reputational damage are not included above. TroCymru's chain-of-custody system directly mitigates these risks.
Without TroCymru
Every programme without a circular waste system carries these risks.
Waste data remains estimated
Without verified, site-level data your ESG reports lack defensibility. Auditors and funders increasingly require evidence, not estimates.
Carbon reporting is unverifiable
Claimed carbon reductions without WRAP/ICE methodology and EN 15978 alignment will not withstand scrutiny from Welsh Government or funding bodies.
Social value is claimed, not evidenced
Without a tracked, quantifiable route to social enterprises, social value figures in tender submissions remain assertions — not proof.
Fly-tipping liability stays with you
Under the Environmental Protection Act 1990, duty of care follows the waste producer. Without chain-of-custody, you cannot prove lawful disposal.
This creates financial, compliance, and reputational risk — risk that is entirely avoidable with a system designed to track, verify, and report from day one.